Rural America

Tuesday, Jun 13, 2017, 2:00 pm

Blacks, Latinos and Indians Think About Climate Change in Ways that Most Other Americans Do Not

By Joseph Bullington

Email this article to a friend

September 21, 2014—The first People's Climate March is held in New York City.   (Image: peoplesclimate.org)

In March, when the Yale Program on Climate Communication released a detailed study of U.S. public opinion about global warming, the New York Times looked at the data and drew some interesting conclusions. Among them: “Most people think climate change will harm Americans, but they don’t think it will happen to them." They have a point.

But, as it turns out, not all Americans feel the same way. A closer examination of the data reveals that people who live in certain places tend to feel more vulnerable to climate change than others.

Below are a series of maps that illustrate this disconnect.

“Global warming will harm people in the U.S.”

Map 1 - Edited.png

(Source: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication)

 

“Global warming will harm me personally”

Map 2 - edited.png.png

(Source: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication)

At first glance, it might appear that Americans are cavalier and unreflective: they think climate change will only hurt "someone else." It is important to note, however, that the perceived risk of climate change is not divided equally—or randomly. If you look closely at the maps, a sinister pattern emerges.

Adults per county who think “global warming will harm me personally," difference from national average

Map 3-Edited.png

(Source: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication)

What accounts for these stand-out patches of green in Alaska, the four-corners area, Montana and the Dakotas? Maybe this next map will help.

Native American and Alaska Native population by county

Map 4 - Edited.png

(Source: Rural Health Information Hub)

 

In the purple states of Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota, a map of perceived risk from climate change turns out to be a nearly perfect map of indian reservation counties. This just might have something to do with the collective memory of the tribes in those areas. The Blackfeet, whose reservation is in the northwest corner of present-day Montana, the Northern Cheyenne, whose reservation is at Lame Deer in the southwest corner of the state, and the various bands of the Lakota, whose reservations are scattered throughout present-day North and South Dakota, among others, are tribes of the plains who shaped their ways of life around the migration of the buffalo herds. In the 1860s and 1870s, when these tribes refused to go quietly and mounted a fierce resistance to white settlement, the United States government set about destroying the buffalo. In a matter of years, the natives saw the ecology of the entire region drastically altered, their way of life driven to near extinction, and themselves forced onto barren, ever-shrinking reservations—scraps of land seen as unprofitable by white settlers, businesses and the government. Since the discovery of uranium, coal, oil and gas rendered these lands not so valueless after all, these peoples have been subjected to the brunt of the environmental destruction wreaked on the region by the mining and oil companies. In short, Native Americans generally have reason to think environmental damage done by white civilization will hurt them, first.

However, this leaves some of the green patches in the "global warming will harm me personally" map unaccounted for. What do we make of the belt of green that contours the southern border in Texas? And the string of green that runs along the Mississippi River and east through Alabama?

Let’s look at some more maps.

Hispanic and Latino population by county

Map 5 - Edited.png

(Source: Rural Health Information Hub)

Black or African American population by county

Map 6 - Edited.png

(Source: Rural Health Information Hub)

 

Though the exact numbers are difficult to measure, climate change is a major driver of increased human migration. It makes sense, then, that awareness of the harm caused by global warming would be heightened along the border between the United States and the countries to the south that will suffer, and are suffering, most of the change—and among the people who have connections to those places.

It also makes sense that black communities would be wary of the threats posed by environmental damage. According to Vann Newkirk, a staff writer at The Atlantic, more than half of people who live close to hazardous waste are people of color. Black children, he points out, are twice as likely to suffer from lead poisoning as white children. Newkirk concludes that this is no accident: “pollution and the risk of disaster are assigned to black and brown communities through generations of discrimination.”

According to the Yale study, 70 percent of Americans believe global warming is happening, 53 percent believe it is mostly human-caused, and 75 percent favor regulating C02 as a pollutant. Trump ignored that public opinion when he justified pulling out of the Paris climate agreement by pitting economic growth against mitigating the effects of climate change. He was speaking clearly to the only audience with whom that argument could possibly make sense: those Americans who don’t think climate change will hurt them.



Joseph Bullington grew up in the small town of White Sulphur Springs, Montana. Recently he spent over a month living in and reporting on the Standing Rock resistance camps opposing the Dakota Access Pipeline. He is now an editorial intern for Rural America In These Times.

View Comments